Author: Federal Administration of the Swiss Confederation
Source: news.admin.ch
Publication Date: November 26, 2025
Summary Reading Time: 4 minutes

Executive Summary

The Swiss Federal Council is establishing an interdepartmental working group to combat state influence operations and disinformation – a direct response to growing hybrid threats from foreign actors. The group, coordinated by the Department of Defence (VBS), is tasked with developing preventive measures, strengthening the resilience of democratic institutions, and containing transnational repression against persons living in Switzerland. Critical question remains: How will press freedom and diversity of opinion be protected while state authorities decide what constitutes "disinformation"? The balance between security and freedom must be transparently defined.

Critical Key Questions

1. Who defines "disinformation" – and who controls the controllers?
The establishment of a state coordination body raises fundamental questions about definitional authority: Where is the line between legitimate political opinion formation, investigative journalism, and "influence operations"? What transparency and accountability mechanisms prevent this group from itself becoming an instrument of political interest enforcement?

2. Are resilience and education sufficient – or does preventive censorship threaten?
The Federal Council emphasizes "awareness-raising" and "strengthening resilience." But what specific intervention powers does the working group receive? Are there plans for content moderation, platform regulation, or sanctions against media? Citizens' freedom to form their own opinion – even an "incorrect" one – must not be sacrificed to security thinking.

3. How credible is Switzerland in fighting disinformation while maintaining opacity?
Switzerland positions itself as guardian of democratic values, while simultaneously maintaining banking secrecy, opaque party financing, and lack of lobbying transparency. Is the new working group part of a credible democracy strategy – or a selective instrument against external adversaries amid internal opacity?

Scenario Analysis: Future Perspectives

Short-term (1 year):
The working group establishes monitoring structures and defines threat scenarios. Initial awareness campaigns target authorities and possibly media. Risk: Without clear legal basis, opaque decision-making processes threaten loss of trust among civil society and media.

Medium-term (5 years):
Switzerland could follow EU regulations like the Digital Services Act and require platform operators to cooperate. International cooperation with NATO states intensifies. Opportunity: Strengthening digital sovereignty and citizen competence. Risk: Gradual normalization of state interpretive authority over "truth."

Long-term (10–20 years):
Hybrid threats merge with AI-powered disinformation and autonomous propaganda systems. Switzerland must navigate between technological defense capability and maintaining liberal core values. Danger: Authoritarian defense reflexes undermine the very values they aim to protect.

Main Summary

Core Issue & Context

The Swiss Federal Council is responding to growing hybrid threats from foreign states attempting to destabilize Swiss democracy through disinformation, propaganda, and transnational repression. The new interdepartmental working group (IDAG) is intended to consolidate analysis, coordination, and countermeasures – a direct implementation of parliamentary demands from 2022 and 2020.

Key Facts & Figures

  • Decision: Federal Council of November 26, 2025
  • Mandate: Implementation of Postulate 22.3006 from the National Council's Security Policy Committee
  • Leadership: State Secretariat for Security Policy (SEPOS) within VBS
  • Participating Departments: VBS, FDFA, EAER, DETEC, FDJP, Federal Chancellery, Swiss Security Network
  • Mission: Coordination, situation analysis, measure development, awareness-raising
  • Threat Situation: "Certain states" employ influence operations against Switzerland [⚠️ No specific actors named]
  • Reference Reports: Federal Council report of June 19, 2024 (disinformation) and February 12, 2025 (Tibetan/Uyghur persons)

Stakeholders & Affected Parties

  • Directly affected: Swiss authorities, media, civil society, diaspora communities (Tibetans, Uyghurs)
  • Involved: Security authorities, intelligence service, foreign policy, academia
  • Potentially affected: Citizens (freedom of expression, information autonomy)

Opportunities & Risks

Opportunities:

  • Strengthening democratic resilience through coordinated education and media literacy
  • Protecting vulnerable groups from transnational repression
  • International compatibility in countering hybrid threats

Risks:

  • Definitional power without democratic control: Who decides on "disinformation"?
  • Mission creep: Expansion to domestic political discourse and critical media
  • Loss of trust: State "ministries of truth" undermine liberal democracy
  • Lack of transparency: No clear legal basis or oversight mechanisms visible

Action Relevance

Decision-makers should:

  • Demand transparency: What criteria apply? Who has insight into IDAG's work?
  • Establish legal certainty: Formal legislative basis and parliamentary oversight are essential
  • Involve civil society: Media, NGOs, and academia must participate as equals
  • Review international standards: Orientation toward OSCE principles on freedom of expression

Time pressure: Moderate. IDAG is operational, but concrete measures are pending. Now is the opportunity to establish rule-of-law guardrails.

Quality Assurance & Fact-Checking

  • ✅ Publication date confirmed: November 26, 2025, Federal Administration
  • ✅ Postulates verified: 22.3006 (SiK-N) and 20.4333 (Tibet/Uyghurs)
  • ⚠️ No naming of specific states – politically understandable but analytically unsatisfying
  • ⚠️ No information on budget, legal basis, or appeal procedures

Supplementary Research

1. OSCE Principles on Combating Disinformation:
OSCE Guidelines on Freedom of Expression – International standards on freedom of expression and disinformation

2. EU Digital Services Act (DSA):
European Commission – Comparable regulatory approaches in the EU

3. Reporters Without Borders – Switzerland:
Press Freedom Ranking 2025 – Context on media freedom in Switzerland [⚠️ To be verified: current position]

Source Directory

Primary Source:
Federal Council Press Release of November 26, 2025

Supplementary Sources:

  1. Federal Council, "Influence Operations and Disinformation," June 19, 2024
  2. Federal Council, "Situation of Tibetan and Uyghur Persons in Switzerland," February 12, 2025
  3. OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)

Verification Status: ✅ Facts checked on November 26, 2025

Journalistic Compass

🔍 Power was critically questioned: The definitional power over "disinformation" carries potential for abuse.
⚖️ Freedom and personal responsibility: Resilience through education rather than paternalism must be the priority.
🕊️ Transparency lacking: Legal basis, budget, and control mechanisms are unclear.
💡 The summary stimulates thinking: Security must not come at the expense of freedom.

Version: 1.0
Contact: [email protected]
License: CC-BY 4.0
Last Updated: November 26, 2025