Swiss Soldiers Should Have Pocket Ammunition at Home Again

Publication Date: 20.11.2025

Overview

  • Author: Felix Müller
  • Source: Tages-Anzeiger
  • Publication Date: 20.11.2025
  • Reading Time: approx. 3-4 minutes
  • Topic: Return of pocket ammunition for Swiss soldiers

Summary

The bourgeois majority in the Council of States committee wants to reverse an 18-year-old security measure. The reason: The Ukraine war has allegedly changed everything.

The key points:

  • 7 to 5 votes in the SiK-S for the reintroduction of pocket ammunition
  • Since 2007, Swiss soldiers have kept their assault rifles at home without ammunition
  • Abolition occurred due to repeated homicides and suicides with army weapons
  • SVP Councillor Werner Salzmann and FDP Councillor Josef Dittli cite "changed security situation" as main argument
  • SP Councillor Franziska Roth criticizes: Scientifically proven successes in suicide and femicide prevention are being undone
  • Suicides with army weapons have indeed decreased since 2007
  • Motion still needs to pass through Council of States and National Council

Opportunities & Risks

Opportunities:

  • Faster response capability in hypothetical threat scenarios
  • Decentralized ammunition storage less vulnerable than central depots
  • Fulfillment of the original militia concept of the Swiss Army

Risks:

  • Increase in suicides and homicides with army weapons (historically proven)
  • Heightened risk of femicides in domestic violence
  • Ammunition in private households harder to control

Looking to the Future

Short-term (1 year): Political debate in both chambers, probably along the usual bourgeois-left lines. Intensive discussions about security vs. prevention.

Medium-term (5 years): If implemented, first measurable impacts on suicide and crime statistics. Possible adjustments or renewed discussions if negative developments occur.

Long-term (10-20 years): Fundamental question about the role of the militia army in a changed Europe. Possibly further security policy reforms depending on geopolitical developments.

Fact Check

Solidly documented:

  • Suicides with army weapons have decreased since 2007
  • Pocket ammunition was abolished in 2007 due to homicides and suicides
  • Committee decision with 7 to 5 votes occurred

Still to be verified:

  • Concrete figures on the decline of suicides with army weapons [⚠️ Still to be verified]
  • Actual vulnerability of central ammunition depots [⚠️ Still to be verified]
  • Whether the Federal Council really envisioned a return in 2007 if the situation changed [⚠️ Still to be verified]

Brief Assessment

A committee majority wants to reverse a proven preventive measure out of fear of hypothetical threats. A vague "changed security situation" stands against scientifically proven successes in suicide prevention. The question is: Does the theoretical possibility of an attack on Switzerland justify the risk of additional deaths in everyday life?

Three Critical Questions

  1. Proportionality: Is it really responsible to sacrifice proven prevention successes for a highly unlikely attack scenario – or is this more about symbolic politics?

  2. Transparency with facts: Why are no concrete figures given on the decline in suicides, and how was the alleged vulnerability of central ammunition depots actually assessed?

  3. Real innovation or regression: Wouldn't there be more modern ways to improve the army's response capability without reverting to an 18-year-old practice that was deliberately abolished?