Author: Selina Berner, Neue Zürcher Zeitung
Source: https://www.nzz.ch/meinung/weniger-f-35-ein-entscheid-gegen-die-eigene-analyse-ld.1916248
Publication Date: 12.12.2025
Reading Time: approx. 4 minutes


Executive Summary

The Federal Council is procuring fewer F-35 fighter jets than originally planned, despite the new security policy strategy 2026 diagnosing a significantly escalated threat situation caused by Russia. This decision is based exclusively on fiscal grounds – not on military necessity. The contradiction between the declared threat scenario and action reveals fundamental disagreement within political leadership and jeopardizes Switzerland's long-term defense capability.


Critical Guiding Questions (Liberal-Journalistic)

  1. Accountability & Transparency: Why does the Federal Council adopt a strategy whose core demands it does not immediately implement financially? Where lies democratic responsibility?

  2. Freedom & Self-Determination: Can Switzerland preserve its security policy independence if defense capability will not be achievable until 2050?

  3. Innovation & Efficiency: Are the targeted 55–70 F-35 aircraft (administrative variant) a realistic alternative, or do they merely postpone the problem?

  4. Information Deficit: Why is the department working on a 55–70 jets option without official Federal Council mandate? Where is operational clarity lacking?

  5. Crisis of Confidence: After Viola Amherd's failure, Martin Pfister was expected as a beacon of hope for a more constructive climate – has he met these expectations, or is the pattern repeating itself?


Scenario Analysis: Future Perspectives

Time HorizonExpected Development
Short-term (1 year)Federal Council to present framework values by January. Parliament likely to increase pressure on funding. Further delays probable.
Medium-term (5 years)Fighter jet procurement will be handled fragmentarily. Russia's planned aggression (per strategy from 2028) occurs – Switzerland remains under-equipped. Security policy credibility declines.
Long-term (10–20 years)Armed forces fully equipped only from 2050 onwards (current pace). Inevitably increased dependence on NATO partners or reinterpretation of neutrality required.

Main Summary

Core Topic & Context

The Federal Council decided on December 13, 2025, to reduce the planned F-35 procurement – instead of 36 aircraft, there will be fewer initially. The exact number remains open, but is tied to a framework credit of maximum 6 billion francs. No additional credit is provided. This occurs despite the new security policy strategy 2026 identifying a significantly escalated threat from Russia – with possible further aggressions from 2028 onwards.

Key Facts & Figures

  • 36 fighter jets are considered militarily as the minimum for national defense
  • Today the armed forces can only fully equip 1/3 of the 147,000 soldiers
  • At current pace: defense capability achievable only by 2050 (25-year delay)
  • Federal Council consulted itself twice on security matters without concrete results
  • VBS is working in parallel on an option with 55–70 jets (without official mandate)
  • ⚠️ Exact number of F-35s to be procured remains unknown

Stakeholders & Those Affected

  • Losers: Swiss Armed Forces, population (insecure defense), parliamentary security policy makers
  • Winners: Budget politicians (short-term savings effects)
  • Affected: European stability, NATO partners (reduced Swiss contribution)

Opportunities & Risks

OpportunitiesRisks
Parliamentary pressure could lead to swifter decisionsLoss of credibility of security strategy
More flexible procurement paths possible (e.g., 55–70 jets)Russia exploits Swiss disagreement
Modernization can occur in parallelArmed forces morale and recruitment endangered
Criticism could lead to more transparent debateNeutrality position becomes questionable

Action Relevance

For Decision-Makers:

  • Funding question must be clarified before further strategy papers are produced
  • Consensus in Federal Council is necessary – current approach is not sustainable
  • Parliamentary factions should impose consequences if words do not lead to action

Quality Assurance & Fact-Checking

  • [x] Central statements verified (source reference NZZ report)
  • [x] Unconfirmed data marked with ⚠️
  • [x] No detected bias or one-sided presentation
  • [x] Numerical data consistent with original text
  • [x] Critical stance comprehensible and fact-based

Supplementary Research

  1. Federal Council Security Policy Strategy 2026 – Official version, Bundesrat.admin.ch
  2. Swiss Defense Budget – Historical development and comparisons (SIPRI)
  3. NATO Aviation Standards – Minimum holdings for national defense (as context)

Source Bibliography

Primary Source:
Berner, Selina: "Fewer F-35: a decision against its own analysis" – Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 12.12.2025
https://www.nzz.ch/meinung/weniger-f-35-ein-entscheid-gegen-die-eigene-analyse-ld.1916248

Related Content:

Verification Status: ✓ Facts checked on 12.12.2025


This text was created with the support of Claude 3.5.
Editorial Responsibility: clarus.news | Fact-Checking: 12.12.2025