Summary
FACOM, in collaboration with the Swiss Accident Insurance Institution (SUVA), is recalling certain TOUKAN knives. The affected models are 640180, 640180SLS, and 640180PB, manufactured between 2024 and 2025 with date and letter markings "D" and "E". The blade can unintentionally fold into the handle without the release button being pressed, which can result in cut injuries. Commercial users and consumers should immediately stop using the knives and contact FACOM to obtain replacements.
Persons
- Swiss Accident Insurance Institution (SUVA) (Cooperation partner)
- FACOM (Manufacturer)
Topics
- Product Safety
- Recall
- Cut Injuries
- Consumer Protection
Clarus Lead
The recall underscores the importance of quality control in the tool industry and potentially affects thousands of users in Switzerland. The collaboration between manufacturer and SUVA signals proactive risk management aimed at preventing injuries. For commercial users and private users, immediate action is required, as the knives must be immediately withdrawn from circulation.
Detailed Summary
The safety risk lies in a design defect of the blade locking mechanism. The blade lock functions defectively, allowing the blade to fold into the handle on its own without the release button being pressed. This creates an immediate cutting hazard to the user's hands and fingers.
The affected batches can be identified by model numbers and date markings. The markings are located on the underside of the blade near the handle attachment. FACOM has committed to collecting affected knives free of charge and replacing them with safe units. Affected persons should not dispose of the knives themselves but should contact the manufacturer directly.
Key Statements
- Design defect in blade locking mechanism leads to uncontrolled folding
- Three model variants affected (640180, 640180SLS, 640180PB) from production years 2024–2025
- Free return and replacement guaranteed by FACOM
- Immediate cessation of use required
Critical Questions
Evidence: How many injury cases have already been documented, and on what basis was the safety risk identified – through customer reports, internal tests, or external inspections?
Conflicts of Interest: What costs does FACOM incur through the recall, and could this create incentives for delayed or incomplete recall communication?
Causality: Are production errors or design deficiencies the cause, and could similar defects potentially affect other FACOM tool series?
Feasibility: How is it ensured that commercial users and private users become aware of this recall, especially if knives are already in use?
Data Quality: Are the date markings "D" and "E" unambiguous and easy to verify, or is there a risk of confusion with other product batches?
Alternatives: Was a repair option instead of replacement considered, and if not, why not?
Source List
Primary Source: SUVA – FACOM Recalls Certain TOUKAN Knives Due to Injury Risk – news.admin.ch, 10.04.2026
Verification Status: ✓ 10.04.2026
This text was created with the support of an AI model. Editorial Responsibility: clarus.news | Fact-Check: 10.04.2026