Summary
The Swiss Council for Accident Prevention (BFU) warns on March 25, 2026 against the Vevor C3A18 Pro laser engraving machine. The device has insufficient protective devices through which Class 4 laser beams can escape. This poses a risk of irreversible eye injuries. Consumers are urged to stop using the product immediately and return it to the point of sale.
People
- BFU – Swiss Council for Accident Prevention (Publisher of the warning)
Topics
- Product safety
- Laser technology and radiation protection
- Eye protection
- Consumer protection
Clarus Lead
The BFU warning signals an immediate safety risk for users of home power tools. The lack of protective devices on a commercially available product underscores the importance of regulatory controls in product certification. For owners of this model, there is an immediate obligation to act to prevent health damage.
Detailed Summary
The Vevor C3A18 Pro laser engraving machine has a critical safety deficiency: the protective devices are insufficiently sized or designed to fully contain Class 4 laser radiation. Laser beams of this power class can cause permanent retinal damage and blindness upon direct or diffuse exposure. The risk exists both during operation and during maintenance work.
The BFU recommends consumers to immediately cease operation of the device. Return to the point of sale is the safe way to prevent further exposure. For technical questions or return procedures, users should contact directly the retail partner that distributed the product.
Key Messages
- Vevor C3A18 Pro laser engraving machine has insufficient protective devices
- Class 4 laser radiation can escape and cause irreversible eye injuries
- Immediate return to point of sale required
- Direct contact with sales partner recommended for return details
Critical Questions
Evidence/Data Quality: On what basis did the BFU make the Class 4 laser classification – through laboratory measurements or manufacturer specifications? How many devices are affected?
Conflicts of Interest: Was the manufacturer Vevor asked for a statement before the public warning? Are there already damage claims or reported injuries?
Causality/Alternatives: Are the protective devices faulty in design or was the device not certified according to safety standards? Are repairs or retrofits possible?
Feasibility/Risks: How is the return handled logistically? Is there a risk that consumers will continue to use the device before returning it?
Source Validity: Is the warning based on a formal product recall notice or on a precautionary BFU recommendation?
Regulation: Which regulatory bodies (METAS, BAG) are involved in the inspection?
Source Directory
Primary Source: Swiss Council for Accident Prevention (BFU) – Warning Vevor C3A18 Pro laser engraving machine – https://www.news.admin.ch/de/newnsb/w6NeGP-J9ccxkETn5brv1
Verification Status: ✓ 25.03.2026
This text was created with the support of an AI model. Editorial responsibility: clarus.news | Fact-checking: 25.03.2026