Customs Deal with the USA: Arms Purchases as Bargaining Chip?

Publication Date: 16.11.2025

Overview

  • Author: srf/chrn/haec;fulu/mcep
  • Source: SRF News
  • Date: 16.11.2025
  • Estimated Reading Time: 3 minutes

Article Summary

What is this about? Switzerland has signed a memorandum of understanding with the USA for lower tariffs. Additional arms purchases could play a role in this - a politically sensitive topic that affects Switzerland's strategic independence.

Important Facts:

  • Customs agreement with USA is currently only a memorandum of understanding, implementation is still pending
  • Arms purchases were a topic in the customs negotiations according to SRF sources
  • F-35 fighter jets are delayed and cost 1 billion francs more than planned
  • Patriot system is delayed due to US priorities for Ukraine
  • USA receives largest market access expansion to the Swiss market
  • Tariff reduction for US products: agricultural goods, machinery, medical technology, aerospace
  • New customs quotas for US meat (chicken, beef, bison)

Affected Groups: Swiss exporters (benefit from lower US tariffs), US defense industry, Swiss taxpayers (with additional arms purchases), European defense suppliers (competition through US preference)

Opportunities & Risks:

  • Opportunities: Better market access for Swiss companies, stronger economic relations
  • Risks: Strategic dependence on USA, higher defense costs, weaker Europe relations

Recommendations: Critical review of strategic independence in defense procurement, diversification of suppliers, transparency in negotiation content

Looking to the Future

Short-term (1 year): Concretization of the customs agreement, clarification of the defense component, possible additional US weapons purchases

Medium-term (5 years): Stronger economic integration with USA, possible weakening of European defense cooperation, impact on Swiss neutrality policy

Long-term (10-20 years): Strategic reorientation of Swiss foreign economic and security policy between USA and Europe, changed balance of power in defense procurement

Fact Check

  • F-35 cost explosion: Confirmed by multiple official sources - originally planned were 6 billion CHF
  • Patriot delays: Confirmed by US priorities for Ukraine support
  • Defense not in memorandum: Confirmed by Defense Minister Pfister
  • Largest US market access expansion: [⚠️ Still to be verified] - White House claim without historical comparison

Additional Sources

  • Federal Department of Economic Affairs (SECO): Official information on trade agreements
  • Federal Department of Defence (VBS): Defense procurement and strategy
  • NZZ am Sonntag: Original reporting on weapons component in the deal

Source List

  • Original Source: SRF News - Customs Deal with the USA, Link
  • Additional Sources:
    1. White House - Official statement on trade agreement
    2. VBS - Defense procurement and F-35 program
    3. NZZ am Sonntag - Investigative reporting on weapons deal
  • Facts checked: on 16.11.2025

Brief Conclusion

Switzerland faces a strategic dilemma: Economic advantages through lower US tariffs could have to be bought with additional arms purchases. Defense Minister Pfister cannot rule out further weapons deals, although previous US defense transactions have already caused delays and additional costs. The agreement raises fundamental questions about Switzerland's strategic independence and neutrality.

Three Key Questions

  1. What risks to strategic freedom arise when trade agreements are linked with military commitments?

  2. Where is more transparency needed from the federal government - what concrete concessions were made to the USA?

  3. How can Switzerland fulfill its responsibility for a balanced security policy without becoming unilaterally dependent on one partner?


Meta

  • Version: 1.0
  • Author: press@clarus.news
  • License: CC-BY 4.0
  • Last Update: 16.11.2025